Optimizing Compliance Management for Capital Projects
Abstract
Successful regulatory compliance in capital projects requires both team-based organizational models and integrated digital tools to enhance communication and track environmental permits.
Screening Criteria
- Funding Source: Examines organizations managing capital projects with federal or state funding.
- Management Focus: Addresses document management and organizational structures in compliance.
- Team Size: Includes project teams of 50+ people.
- Study Type: Case studies or systematic reviews.
- Project Context: Focuses on regulatory compliance in capital projects.
Characteristics of Included Studies
| Study | Project Scale | Primary Focus | Implementation Approach | Key Technologies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neil et al., 2005 | $1.3 billion, 8-10 years | Bridge repair & replacement | Environmental tools integration | Web-based GIS, PCA |
| Shipley, 2010 | $2.5 billion, 18.8-mile highway | New highway construction | Comprehensive environmental management | Integrated documentation system, GIS |
| Shipley, 2011 | 18.8-mile highway | Environmental compliance | Real-time data management | GeoFusion Center, Google Earth, SharePoint |
| Simmons, 2014 | $7 billion, 200 projects | Water supply infrastructure | Proactive permit management | Microsoft Access database |
| Smith & Weber, 2005 | 52 projects | Regulatory process streamlining | Multi-Agency Permitting Team | Not specified |
Implementation Strategies
| Study | Organization Model | Communication Methods | Success Metrics | Resource Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neil et al., 2005 | OBDP Environmental Team | Phased PCA submittals, electronic reporting | Environmental metrics via GIS | Not mentioned |
| Shipley, 2010 | Environmental Management Team | Real-time data sharing | Monetary incentives | Not mentioned |
| Shipley, 2011 | Environmental Compliance Team (ECT) | Web-based collaboration | Environmental metrics, monetary incentives | Not mentioned |
| Simmons, 2014 | Permit Resource Division (PRD) | Microsoft Access database | On-time & on-budget delivery | 5.5-person staff |
| Smith & Weber, 2005 | Multi-Agency Permitting Team | Co-location of staff | Eight performance measures | Staff from 5 agencies |
Key Findings
- Integrated technological solutions, including GIS and web-based applications, enhance regulatory compliance.
- Real-time data management is crucial for effective communication and timely decision-making.
- Environmental metrics are a common success measure.
- Multi-agency coordination improves compliance and reduces delays.
- Proactive permit management leads to better project outcomes.
References
Shipley, H. (2011). "Environmental Compliance Management Using GeoFusion Center."
Shipley, H. (2010). "Intercounty Connector (ICC): Environmental Compliance Management Using Integrated Technologies."
Neil, J., Toledo, Z. O., & Kirkman, R. (2005). "Managing Environmental Compliance for ODOT’s OTIA III State Bridge Delivery Program."
Smith, J. & Weber, S. (2005). "Multi-Agency Permitting Teams: Teamwork as a Critical Tool to Joint Delivery of Transportation and Environmental Protection Needs."
Simmons, P. (2014). "Permit Management: Keeping Projects in Compliance—Aggressive Permit Management for NYC Wastewater Treatment and Water Supply Capital Plan."
